TEACHER OPINION ABOUT USING PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION
| Author's Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Institutional affilation - Country | Author's Email | Author's ORCID |
|
University of Maribor - Slovenia |
lara.voler@student.um.si |
n/a |
|
Volume/Issue :
Article type :
Original article
Page No :
49-56
Abstract :
A school for the 21st century requires innovative approaches to learning and teaching. The presented research investigates the current state of innovative teaching methods, particularly problem-based learning (PBL), among teachers of the subject Technology and Engineering (TE) in Slovenian lower secondary schools. The main aim of the research was to determine the attitude towards such innovative teaching approaches, how often innovative teaching methods are used, how teachers perceive their importance, and finally, according to the teachers, how they are qualified for this. In the research, an appropriate questionnaire for teachers is developed. Qualitative and quantitative research was conducted using an online survey and statistical data processing. The online survey results showed that teachers positively assess the importance of using PBL, which is perceived as a more challenging method than traditional teaching methods. Despite numerous challenges, teachers express high motivation to improve their teaching practices. Based on the data obtained, it is found that teachers' knowledge is assessed less positively than their competence assessment, which indicates the need for more accurate methods of evaluating knowledge and emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development. The research findings could be important for improving teaching practices and promoting innovations in the educational process. High motivation and readiness of teachers to accept innovative pedagogical approaches can contribute to a better learning environment and the development of a more competent teacher in the future.
Keywords :
continuous professional development, innovative teaching methods, problem-based learning, student motivation, teacher competence, technology and engineering
References :
Aberšek, B. (2012). Didaktika tehniškega izobraževanja med teorijo in prakso [Didactics of technical education between theory and practice]. National Education Institute Slovenia.
Aberšek, B. (2022). Science, critical thinking, multi-attribute decision making. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 80(4), 494–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/pec/22.80.494
Aberšek, B. (2018). Problem-based learning and proprioception. Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning. Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 369–398. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
Bonk, C. J., Graham, C. R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning. Pfeifer
Cencelj, Z., Aberšek, B., Flogie, A., & Kordigel Aberšek, M. (2020). Metacognitive model for developing science, technology and engineering functional literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 220–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.220
EC (2021). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0022&from=EN
Eurydice (2003). Defining competences and curriculum. European reference points for the teaching profession. Prepared by Eurydice for Study Visit (England, April 2003). https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3107567
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benavides, F. (2013). O naravi učenja [About the nature of learning]. Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
Fiksl, M., Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2017). Innovative teaching/learning methods to improve science, technology and engineering classroom climate and interest. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1009–1019.
Flogie, A., & Aberšek, B. (2019). The impact of innovative ICT education and AI on the pedagogical paradigm. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Graham, C. R. (2005). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, locala designs. Pfeiffer Publishing.
Halász, G., & Michel, A. (2011). Key competences in Europe: Interpretation, policy. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01491.x
Kordigel Aberšek, M., & Aberšek, B. (2022). New digital competence for science technology and engineering education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(1), 108–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.108
Krnel, D. (2007). Pouk z raziskovanjem [Learning with research]. Modrijan.
OECD (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (year I): Učitelji in vodje šol kot vseživljenjsko učenje [Results (year I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners]. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
Vičič Krabonja, M., Kustec, S., Skrbinjek, V., Aberšek, B., & Flogie, A. (2024). Innovative professional learning communities and sustainable education practices through digital transformation. Sustainability, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146250
Vodopivec, I. (2003). Kaj prinaša sodelovalno učenje [What collaborative learning brings]. Revija Zavoda RS za šolstvo, 6(1), 20−21.
Cite as :
Voler, L., Flogie, A. (2024). Teacher opinion about using problem-based learning in technology and engineering education. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 21(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/24.21.49
