Volume/Issue :

Article type :

Case study

Page No :

61-73

Abstract :

There are some trends currently being monitored in the country: interest in science studies and related professions is decreasing; unsatisfactory results of international student achievement research (PISA, TIMSS). In order to make students more interested in natural sciences and to motivate them to relate their life to STEAM activities, it is appropriate to encourage students to engage in independent research and to discover the joy of discovery. One of the ways to solve this problem is the students' practical experimental activity in the laboratories of University. In this way, students not only get to know the laws of science, new technologies, but also carry out experiments, research and projects. The research analyses the usage of STEAM program “Cognition of Energy and Thermal Processes” for students of ninth (1st Gymnasium) grades in order to deepen and broaden the knowledge of natural science education, develop practical abilities of students and their scientific researcher's competence. Students are advised to do five experimental works in this field. The program engages a basic educational method – inquiry-based learning. The results of the pedagogical experiment and the questionnaire survey are discussed. It can be stated that educational experimental activities are necessary and useful for students. By using these experimental activities, students can be provided with educational material in an attractive form, which stimulates the interest in the subject. Program participants have deepened and expanded their knowledge of energy and thermal processes in nature. Students improved their competence in natural science research. They learned how to plan and perform experiments, acquired the ability to formulate hypotheses, to make assumptions, to analyse and explain results, and to formulate reasoned conclusions. Students acquired practical skills to work properly and safely with devices and tools (computer systems Nova 5000 and Xplorer GLX, temperature, humidity sensors, caliper, scales, etc.) Students liked to be young researchers; they felt the joy of discovery by practically experimenting and independently exploring natural phenomena.

Keywords :

experimental skills, science learning system, inquiry-based learning, STEAM education

References :

Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of Inquiry-based learning method on students academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41, https://www.doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104
Avouris, N. M., Tselios, N., & Tatakis, E. C. (2001). Development and evaluation of a computer-based laboratory teaching tool. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 9(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.1001
Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(6), 66-70. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1c75/083a05630a663371136310a30060a2afe4b1.pdf
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72, 30-33.
Bernhard, J. (2003). Physics learning and Microcomputer Based Laboratory (MBL) learning effects of using MBL as a technological and as a cognitive tool. In: Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., Fassoulopoulos, G., & Kallery, M. (Eds), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp 323-331). Springer.
Billiar, K., Hubelbank, J., Oliva, T., & Camesano, T. (2014). Teaching STEM by design. Advances in Engineering Education, 4(1), 1-21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076147.pdf
Brush, T., & Saye, J. W. (2017). Successfully implementing problem-based learning in classrooms: Research in K-12 and teacher education. Purdue University Press.
Connor, A. M., Karmokar, S., & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 5(2), 37-47. https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jep/article/view/4458
DeJarnette, N. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133(1), 77-84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ996974
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Erickson, P. W. (2013). Full STEAM ahead. American School & University, 85(10), 36.
Fan, S., & Yu, K. (2016). Core value and implementation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum in technology education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 153-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.6209%2fJORIES.2016.61(2).06
Filippi, A., & Agarwal, D. (2017). Teachers from instructors to designers of inquiry-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: How effective inquiry-based science education implementation can result in innovative teachers and students. Science Education International, 28(4), 258-270. http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/december2017/p2.pdf
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
Han, S., Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on students' achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 13 (Special issue), 3-29.
Harms, U. (2000). Virtual and remote labs in physics education. http://discoverlab.com/References/harms1.pdf
Harper, C. (2017). The STEAM-powered classroom. Educational Leadership, 75(2), 70-74. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/oct17/vol75/num02/The_STEAM-Powered_Classroom.aspx
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
Horak, A. K., & Galluzzo, G. R. (2017). Gifted middle school students’ achievement and perceptions of science classroom quality during problem-based learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 28(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1932202X16683424
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 21-28. https://ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/article/view/105/106
Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Integrated STEM education through Project-Based Learning. https://studentsatthecenterhub.org/resource/integrated-stem-education-through-project-based-learning/
Lai, C. (2018). Using inquiry-based strategies for enhancing students’ STEM education learning. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(1), 110-117. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170947
Lamanauskas V. (2007). Science education as a core component of educatedness. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 1(1), 5-6. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/Lamanauskas.Editorial.Vol.1.pdf
Lamanauskas, V. (2010). Integrated science education in the context of the constructivism theory: Some important issues. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 25(1), 5-9. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/files/pdf/vol25/5-9.Lamanauskas_Vol.25.pdf
Lee, O. (2011). Effective STEM education strategies for diverse and underserved learners. Paper Prepared for the Workshop of the Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Lou, S., Shih, R., Diez, C. R., & Tseng, K. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among female Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9114-8
Sassi, E. (2001). Computer supported lab-work in physics education: Advantages and problems. In: Pinto, R., & Surinach, S. (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 57-64). Elsevier.
Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. 1995). Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653
U.S. STEM Task Force. (2014). Innovate: A blueprint for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in California public education. Dublin, CA: Californians Dedicated to Education Foundation. https://www.cde.ca.gov/pd/ca/sc/documents/innovate.pdf
Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the US as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072

Cite as :

Šlekienė, V., & Lamanauskas, V. (2020). Development and improving students' experimental skills through STEM activities. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 17(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/20.17.61