FOOD ADDITIVES—OPPORTUNITY OR THREAT? “GLASSES” AS AN ACTIVE LEARNING METHOD FOR TEACHING SOCIO SCIENTIFIC ISSUES

DOI: 10.48127/gu-nse/25.22.42

Author's Information
Author Institutional affilation - Country Author's Email Author's ORCID

Alicja Fryc
Aleksandra Pasik
Iwona Maciejowska

Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

alicja.fryc@student.uj.edu.pl
aleksandra.1.pasik@student.uj.edu.pl
iwona.maciejowska@uj.edu.pl

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0921-9391
n/a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-4853


Volume/Issue :
Volume 22
,
Issue 1


Article type :

Case study


Page No :

42-50


Abstract :

This article presents a case of good pedagogical practice in chemistry education: the active learning method “Glasses” (role playing combined with collaborative learning, text work, and debate) applied to the socio scientific issue (SSI) of food additives. Implemented in a December 2025 microteaching session with second year master’s students in Chemistry and Medical Chemistry at Jagiellonian University (winter semester 2025/26), the approach fostered critical discussion, multi perspective reasoning, and evidence based argumentation. Students were randomly assigned to roles—doctors, lawyers, scientists, producers, and influencers—and received role tailored texts (generated with Gen AI except for the influencer role, which AI refused to produce due to factuality constraints). The activity began with a short role play scenario and continued as a moderated, whole group discussion. A qualitative evaluation, based on instructors’ observations, in class feedback, assessment cards, and an anonymous post session survey, indicated perceived knowledge gains, strong engagement, and improved confidence. Frequently recalled concepts included legal regulations, mandatory safety testing, and “the dose makes the poison,” with students acknowledging that additives contribute to food security. The method’s strengths, limitations, and Gen AI affordances are discussed, and implications for practice are provided, including role switching (“swapping glasses”), visual supports to reduce reading fatigue, and careful moderation to balance emotional engagement with scientific rigor.


Keywords :

socio scientific issues (SSI), role playing, active learning methods, food additives, misinformation, AI in education, chemistry education, microteaching


References :

Alfarwan, A. (2025). Generative AI use in K‑12 education: A systematic review. ⁠Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1647573. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1647573
Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). “21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD Countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ application of chemical concepts when solving chemistry problems in different contexts. ⁠Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP0005IJ
Brudnik, E., Moszyńska, A., & Owczarska, B. (2003). Ja i mój uczeń pracujemy aktywnie 2. Przewodnik po metodach aktywizujących [My student and I work actively 2: A guide to active learning methods] (pp. 34–35). Oficyna Wydawnicza Nauczycieli.
European Food Safety Authority. (2025). Food additives. EFSA. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/food-additives
European Parliament and Council. (2008, December 16). Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 on food additives. Official Journal of the European Union.
Evangelou, F. (2023). Teaching techniques for developing the learner‑centred approach in the classroom. ⁠European Journal of Education Studies, 10(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i2.4667
Fayzullina, A. R., Filippova, A. A., Garnova, N. Y., Astakhov, D. V., Kalmazova, N., & Zaripova, Z. F. (2025). Artificial intelligence in science education: A systematic review of applications, impacts, and challenges. ⁠Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), Article ep613. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17519
Gerges, E. (2025). Science education in the age of misinformation. ⁠Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1615769
Gutierrez, D. (2016). Companies are working hard to get you addicted to milk ... and they're using aspartame to do it, NaturalNews, https://www.naturalnews.com/053312_dairy_industry_sweeteners_aspartame.html
Heyes, J. D. (2016). Aspartame is a hidden schedule II narcotic, NaturalNews, https://www.naturalnews.com/054222_aspartame_schedule_ii_narcotic_addictive_chemical.html
Heyes, J. D. (2016). Pepsi to reintroduce aspartame into diet drinks... because ignorant, suicidal consumers kept asking for it, NaturalNews https://www.naturalnews.com/054555_pepsi_aspartame_artificial_sweeteners.html
Högström, P., Gericke, N., Wallin, J., & Bergman, E. (2024). Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. ⁠Science & Education, 34, 3079–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In S. M. Brito (Ed.), Active learning: Beyond the future. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086
Johnson, L. D. (2025, March 13). RFK Jr. to axe FDA’s GRAS loophole, forcing scientific studies on a range of harmful food additives, including these 43 additives of concern. Natural News. https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-03-13-rfkjr-axe-fdas-gras-loophole-forcing-scientific-studies.html
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. ⁠Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
Melios, S., Asimakopoulou, A. A., Greene, C. M., Crofton, E., & Grasso, S. (2025). Food‑related fake news, misleading information, established misconceptions, and food choice. ⁠Current Opinion in Food Science, 63, Article 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101309
Ministry of National Education. (2024, June 28). Regulation of the Minister of National Education on the programme basis of general education for general secondary school, technical secondary school and industry school of the first and second degree (Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland 2024, item 996).
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J., Pimentel, D., Alberts, B., Allchin, D., Barzilai, S., Bergstrom, C., Coffey, J., Donovan, B., Kivinen, K., Kozyreva, A., & Wineburg, S. (2022). Science education in an age of misinformation. Stanford University.
Tarasek, K., Adamska, M., Dulęba, K., Synowiec, K., & Maciejowska, I. (2024). Solving chemical puzzles: Detective mystery as a context for team‑based learning and knowledge inquiry. ⁠Gamtamokslinis Ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 21(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/24.21.120
Wells, S. D. (2016). Aspartame creates depression and exacerbates anxiety—Here’s how. Natural News. https://www.naturalnews.com/054148_aspartame_depression_brain_chemistry.html
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 49–77). Springer. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ849716.pdf



Cite as :

Fryc, A., Pasik, A., & Maciejowska, I. (2025). Food additives—opportunity or threat? “Glasses” as an active learning method for teaching socio scientific issues. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 22(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/25.22.42