Volume/Issue :

Article type :

Original article

Page No :

75-86

Abstract :

Learning analytics is identified as one of the essential preconditions for ensuring the quality of learning for each student and is associated with the wider possibilities of organizing individualized learning. One of the priorities of Lithuanian education is the individualization and personalization of science and mathematics teaching, which is related to one of the priorities of Lithuanian education, that is recognizing the need to develop students' mathematics, science, and technology competencies as well as to foster a culture of innovation in schools. The importance of integrated teaching (learning) for the sustainable development of a student's science and mathematics competence is recognized. However, problems arise in addressing the issues of integrated science and mathematics organization in the classroom, in finding the most appropriate didactic solutions at the level of a student and a classroom. The benefits of learning analytics in modern education are not in doubt, but in educational practice the approach to it is ambiguous: the search for learning analytics tools, the system of its use, the definitions of benefits for the learner. It is acknowledged that in the discourse of the use of learning analytics in science education, there is little research, examples of pedagogical practice that contain analysis of the possibilities of digital platforms with artificial intelligence and learning analytics tools, and the analysis of teachers' experiences. In the conducted qualitative study (focus group discussion) with mathematics and science teachers, who have accumulated experience in working with digital platforms and applying artificial intelligence-based learning analytics, the possibilities of using learning analytics in the lesson have been disclosed. Focus groups participants are teachers who in 2021. September - December participated in a project with the aim to test learning analytics tools in science education and math lessons. The results of the study revealed that teachers do not question the benefits of integrating digital platforms with artificial intelligence-based learning analytics in identifying student (classroom) learning gaps, learning characteristics, and making evidence-based decisions about learning differentiation and individualization. The results of the focus group discussion with science education and mathematics teachers regarding the use of digital teaching and learning platforms integrating learning analytics in lessons revealed that the priority of learning analytics in lessons is to identify and capture gaps in students' learning achievements and knowledge in a timely manner. The analysis of a student (students) learning data that is provided by digital platforms, which integrate artificial intelligence and learning analytics, allows teachers to make the most appropriate decisions about the organization of teaching: to differentiate and individualize teaching, to consistently develop pupils' general competencies. The results of the discussion highlighted the benefits of learning analytics tools for the learner (students): learning analytics tools allow students to see personal progress; receive the tasks assigned to them individually; implement collaborative learning; engage (intellectually and emotionally) in learning activities; learn not only during lessons. An important criterion for the integration of mathematics and science lessons is the use of the learning analytics tools, the joint work of teachers in analyzing students' learning strengths and weaknesses, finding the best learning opportunities, and making similar or different lesson organization decisions. Participants of the study emphasized the importance of learning analytics data in planning and organizing integrated mathematics and science lessons, i.e. synergistic opportunities for learning analytics in the organization of integrated mathematics and science education. The results of the research do not allow making generalized conclusions that would be suitable for the whole Lithuania, however the results of the research revealed that the development of models for the application of learning analytics and the analysis of their effectiveness are important directions for further research.

Keywords :

focus group interviews, learning analytics, science education, math lessons

References :

Bransford, J., Stevens, R., Schwartz, D., Meltzof, A., Pea, R., Roschelle, J., Vye, N., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Barron, B., Reeves, B., & Sabelli, N. (2006). Learning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handboinok of educational psychology (2nd Edition, pp. 209-244). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Dagienė, V., Futschek, G., & Stupurienė, G. (2019). Creativity in solving short tasks for learning computational thinking. Constructivist Foundations, 14(3), 382–396. https://constructivist.info/14/3/382
Dolgopolovas, V., Dagienė, V., & Jevsikova, T. (2020). Methodological guidelines for the design and integration of software learning objects for scientific programming education. Scientific Programming, 2020, Article 6807515. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6807515
Hoel, T., Griffiths, D., & Chen, W. (2017). The influence of data protection and privacy frameworks on the design of learning analytics systems. Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027414
Ifenthaler, D., Gibson, D., Prasse, D., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2021). Putting learning back into learning analytics: actions for policy makers, researchers, and practitioners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09909-8
Kurvinen, E., Kaila, E., Laakso, M. J., & Salakoski, T. (2020). Long term effects on technology enhanced learning: The use of weekly digital lessons in mathematics. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.04
Laakso, M. J., Rajala, T., Kaila, E., & Salakoski, T. (2008). The impact of prior experience in using a visualization tool on learning to program. Appeared in Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2008), 13–15.
Mangaroska, K., & Giannakos, M. (2018). Learning analytics for learning design: A systematic literature review of analytics-driven design to enhance learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(4), 516–534.
Mangaroska, K., Vesin, B., & Giannakos, M. (2019). Cross-platform analytics: A step towards personalization and adaptation in education. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, LAK19, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303825
Morgan, D. L., & Scannell, A. (1998). Planning Focus Group as qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Nyumba, T., Wilson, Derrick, C., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Pineda, A. F., & Cadavid, J. M. (2018). A systematic literature review in Learning Analytics. Workshop de Ciência de Dados Educacionais (WCDE), Anais, CBIE 2018, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/cbie.wcbie.2018.429
Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 655–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 3003–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5
Stewart, D.W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2013). Focus groups – Theory and practice. SAGE.
Van den Bogaard, M. E. D., Drachsler, H., Duisterwinkel, H., Knobbout, J., Manderveld, J., & De Wit, M. (2016). Learning analytics in education design: A guide. Utrecht: SURFnet.
van der Vlies, R. (2020). Digital strategies in education across OECD countries: Exploring education policies on digital technologies. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 226, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/33dd4c26-en
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 2, 177–199.

Cite as :

Šmitienė, G., Girdzijauskienė, R., Melnikova, J., Norvilienė, A., & Šakytė-Statnickė, G. (2021). Mokymosi analitikos naudojimas matematikos ir gamtamokslinio ugdymo pamokose: pagrindinio ugdymo mokytojų patirtys [Applying learning analytics in mathematics and science education lessons: Experiences of teachers in basic education]. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 18(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/21.18.75