Volume/Issue :

Article type :

Case study

Page No :

32-38

Abstract :

The article provides the advantages and disadvantages of the use of Smart board in the integrated lesson of geography and biology. Some problems are discussed, related with the recent new teaching device at school. The evaluation and possibilities of usage of the Smart board are provided in the article as well as the methodology of the integrated geography and biology lesson in the 11th form. A Smart board is an instrument to make the teaching more interesting, faster and simpler whereas the knowledge of the pupils‘ becomes deeper and more generalizing. The basis of this work is curiosity of the pupils, and the help to satisfy this curiosity on the teacher‘s side. However, it should be mentioned, that the process of preparation for the lesson due to realise the teaching process discussed, is prolonged but this is justified by the increased teaching motivation of the learners. The pedagogical technology includes the sequence of operations, which provides a possibility to achieve high results while using low input; introduces the way of systematic thinking in education, what provides a possibility to thoroughly manage the teaching process.

Keywords :

Smart board, integrated teaching, individualisation and differentiation in the (self)training process, competence of the subject, evaluation and self-evaluation

References :

Betts S. (2003). Does the use of ICT affect quality in learning science at Key Stage 3? Studies in Teaching and Learning, 9–17.
Dabrišienė V. (1998). Integruoto ugdymo programų sudarymo principai. Edukologijos studi-jos Lietuvos mokyklai. Kaunas: Technologija, p. 67–79.
Jackūnas Ž. (1993). Ugdymo integracijos metmenys. Lietuvos švietimo reformos gairės. Vil-nius: Valstybinis leidybos centras, p. 89–91.
Kiliuvienė D. (2006). Integruotasis ugdymas. Klaipėda: KU, p. 16.
Kompetencijų ugdymas (2012). Metodinė knyga mokytojams. Vilnius, 2012.
Markauskaitė L. (2000). Informacijos ir komunikacijos technologijos integravimo į ugdymą krypčių analizė. Informatika, 2(36), 59–85.
Mokomųjų kompiuterinių priemonių naudojimo ir diegimo tyrimas (2003). Vilnius www.smm.lt/svietimo_bukle/docs/MK_tyrimas.pdf
Newton L. (2000). Data-logging in practical science: research and reality. International Jour-nal of Science Education, 22 (12), 1247–1259.
Osborne J., Hennessy S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: promise, problems and future directions. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab. http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/reviews/se01.htm
School science resource. Available online: http://www.schoolscience.co.uk/
Science and ICT. Available online: http://www.shambles.net/pages/learning/ScienceP/scict/
Science. ICT opportunities. Available online: http://www.ncaction.org.uk/subjects/science/ict-ops.htm
Thomas G. P. ( 2001). Toward effective computer use in high school science education: where to from here? Education and Information Technologies, 6 (1), 29–41.
Science Teaching in Schools in Europe Policies and Research (2006). „Eurydice“ Project Re-port. Directorate General for Education and Culture, European Commission. Available online: http://www.eurydice.org/portal/page/portal/Eurydice/PubContents?pub=081EN

Cite as :

Railienė, L., & Baltušytė, R. (2012). Use of smart board in the integrated process of (self) training. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 9(3), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/12.9.32b