DIAGNOSTICS OF STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION TO STUDY CHEMISTRY, MATHEMATICS AND BIOLOGY IN THE CONDITIONS OF PROFILED EDUCATION

DOI: 10.48127/gu-nse/17.14.124

Author's Information
Author Institutional affilation - Country Author's Email Author's ORCID

Elena Belnitskaya
Igor Svirshchevsky

Graduate School of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus - Republic of Belarus
National Institute of Education - Republic of Belarus

belel@mail.ru
belel@mail.ru

n/a
n/a


Volume/Issue :
Volume 14
,
Issue 3


Article type :

Original article


Page No :

124-134


Abstract :

Profiled education involves the selection of subjects for learning. However, there is a problem of choice for many 15-year-old students in the conditions of profile education. The students' choice of the education profile is related to the motivation to study the subject. But the students' motives may be different. These are not always internal motives. Was the profile choice correct? What motivates students to study chemistry, biology, mathematics? What helps and what prevents the study of these subjects? The teacher can receive answers to these questions by means of diagnostics of students' motivation by specially developed method. The presented methodological and diagnostic materials to measure the motivation of 15-year-old students to study chemistry, mathematics and biology are aimed at increasing the effectiveness of pre-profile training of students.


Keywords :

educational motivation, students, profile education, pre-profile training, chemistry training


References :

Lukyanova, M., & Kalinina N. (2004). Psychological and pedagogical indicators of school activities: Criteria and diagnosis. Minsk: TC Sphere.
Naughton, J. (2016). Our young people need to study science and technology for a brighter future. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/23/science-maths-engineering-technology-vital-subjects.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Results in Focus. Retrieved from https://app.pisa4u.org/system/resources/original_976d524809c2ef61492965cac66405d0b219e2fb.pdf?1489519650.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and Practices for Successful Schools, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en.
Seymour, E. (2000). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar.
Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42 (5), 36-41. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43631580



Cite as :

Belnitskaya, E., & Svirshchevsky, I. (2017). Diagnostics of students' motivation to study chemistry, mathematics and biology in the conditions of profiled education. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas / Natural Science Education, 14(3), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu-nse/17.14.124