Volume/Issue :

Article type :

Original article

Page No :

28-45

Abstract :

Teacher preparation remains an urgent and significant part of education system. Changing socioeconomic, political, technological concrete country conditions require constant changes in teacher preparation system. As never before, such a demand is even more strengthened by an occurring link between education and labour market. Teachers is an undoubted integrating part of education policy and internship. The carried out scientific surveys show, that in Europe as well as in other countries teachers and schools encounter with similar pedagogue preparation problems: there are discussions on the selection of candidates to teacher’s profession, professional and subject teacher preparation, competence, preparation length, teachers’ professional self-consciousness, prestige, teacher educators’ partnerships and so on. The research was carried out between January and February 2014, i. e., at the beginning of the second study semester. The research is based on the attitude, that students’ opinion and evaluation researches are important, because they allow establishing urgent problems and clarifying the known ones. Referring to the respondent proposal analysis, one can suggest problem solution ways and evaluate possible consequences. Opinion researches is an effective means seeking to initiate the changes, in this case, to improve pedagogical internship organisation. Pedagogical internship, undoubtedly, remains a very significant element of pedagogical study structure and process. Competence, practical experience acquisition, personal improvement and all-round knowledge of educational institution are considered the most important advantages of the internship. This is not only a certain future teacher’s self-examination in a real educational environment, but also a proper way to improve. On the other hand, internship organisation is not appropriate enough. A few very important things are obvious: a short pedagogical internship time, coherence with the studies at university, and not sufficiently purposefully defined internship activities (content aspect). Mentors’ work should be improved; however, this is not treated as a very important drawback. Also, two improvement spheres have been exposed: internship content/programme improvement (to concretise, optimise, and more clearly regulate the activities) and strengthening interaction effectiveness between university and basic practical schools. Pedagogical internship effectiveness (from the point of view of pedagogical ability consolidation, improvement) remains undoubted. On the other hand, certain requirements should be raised for the institution, in which students would like and could perform pedagogical internship. Educational institution’s democracy and openness, technological supply, ecological friendliness/suitability are considered the most essential requirements. The existing pedagogical internship model in Lithuania has to be improved in two main directions – process (internship length increasing, guaranteeing the acquaintance with the variety of pedagogical institutions, interaction with the internship leaders and mentors improvement) and content (activity optimisation, innovativeness, variety increase) improvement.

Keywords :

future teachers, pedagogical internship, teacher education, university students

References :

Aukštikalnytė D. (2001). Pedagoginė praktika kaip būsimųjų mokytojų bendravimo kompe-tencijos gerinimo prielaida [Pedagogical practice a precondition as perfection of futu-re teacher`s communication competence]. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 8, 205–215.
Barkauskaitė M., Pečiuliauskienė M. (2009).Universitetinės pedagoginės praktikos turinio ir struktūros projektavimo konstruktyvistinės įžvalgos. Pedagogika, 96, 43–48
Gaigalienė M. (2001). Pedagoginių situacijų raiška pedagoginės praktikos metu [Expression of pedagogical situations during the pedagogical practice]. Pedagogika, 55, 54–62.
Hussain I., Mahmood Sheikh T. (2010). Practice teaching or internship: professional development of prospective teachers through their pre-service training programmes. Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 105–122.
Kim Chuan G., Wong A. F., Choy D., Tan Justina P. (2009). Confidence levels after practicum experiences of student teachers in Singapore: An exploratory study. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 6 (2), 121–140.
Lamanauskas V. Pedagoginė praktika: keletas apmąstymų (Pedagogical Practice: Some Reflections). Švietimas: politika, vadyba, kokybė / Education Policy, Management and Quality, 2 (14), 4–6.
Lukavičienė V. (2012). Pedagoginės praktikos organizavimo kaita: Šiaulių universiteto edu-kologijos katedros raidos kontekste. Kn.: Mokytojų rengimas XXI amžiuje: pokyčiai ir perspektyvos. Šiauliai, p. 11–16.
Malinauskas R. ( 2001). Pedagogikos studentų parengtis pedagoginėms funkcijoms atlikti. Pedagogika, 48, 22–32.
McNamara J. (2008). The challenge of assessing student capabilities in legal internships. In. WACE Asia Pacific Conference, 30 Sept – 3rd Oct 2008, Sydney, Australia.
Martišauskienė E. (2007). Studentų asmenybinio ugdymo(si) pedagoginių kompetencijų sklaida per pedagoginę praktiką [Dissemination of students` pedagogical competences of personality self-development during teaching practice]. Pedagogika, 86, 14–22.
Pedagogų rengimo reglamentas (2010). Vilnius: LR Švietimo ir mokslo ministerija. Prieiga Internete: http://www.smm.lt/uploads/documents/Pedagogams/Pedagogu_rengimo_reglamentas_20100108.pdf (10 March 2014).
Pedagogų rengimo reglamentas (2012). Vilnius: LR Švietimo ir mokslo ministerija. Prieiga Internete: https://www.leu.lt/download/11500/2012-12-12%20pedagogu% 20rengimo%20reglamentas.pdf (15 March 2014).
Romm I., Gordon-Messer S., Kosinski-Collins M. (2010). Educating young educators: a pe-dagogical internship for undergraduate teaching assistants. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, 80–86. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.09-09-0060.
Stankevičienė K. (2004). Pedagoginės praktikos modelis ir jo veiksmingumas edukologijos (ikimokyklinio ugdymo) studijose. Pedagogika, 73, 64–69.
Subotkevičienė R. (2008). Mokytojų rengimo tendencijų įvairovė. Pedagogika, 90, 37–43.
Tamulaitienė A. (2002). Pedagoginės praktikos. Vilnius: VPU.
Ламанаускас В., Лукавичене В. (2013). Педагогическая практика в системе подготовки педагогов в Литве: ретроспектива и перспектива. В кн. Модернизация непрерывной (продолжительной) практики и внедрение механизмов ее организации в систему высшего педагогического образования (Международная конференция, 1–5 июля, 2013 г., Ереван) [Modernization of continuous practice and implementation of organizational mechanisms in the higher pedagogical education system (International conference, July 1–5, 2013, Yerevan)]. Ереван: Армянский государственный педагогический университет им. Х. Абовяна, c. 396–406.

Cite as :

Lamanauskas, V., Lukavičienė, V., & Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2014). Pedagoginė universiteto studentų praktika: privalumai, trūkumai, gerinimas [University students pedagogical internship: Advantages, disadvantages, improvement]. Švietimas: politika, vadyba, kokybė / Education Policy, Management and Quality, 6(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.48127/spvk-epmq/14.6.28