THE DIFFICULTIES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT OF CHILDREN WHO EXPERIENCED SEPARATION WITH PARENTS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF CUMULATIVE RISK
| Author's Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Institutional affilation - Country | Author's Email | Author's ORCID |
|
Vilnius Pedagogical University - Lithuania |
tomas.lazdauskas@vpu.lt |
0000-0002-7983-2701 |
|
Volume/Issue :
Article type :
Original article
Page No :
19-28
Abstract :
Psychological peculiarities of children exposed to separation from parents have already been analyzed for a long period of time but the topicality of the problem has not decreased. Most often children are separated with one of the parents because of their divorce and the rate of the divorce in Lithuania is very high. In recent years a lot of attention has been paid to new child-parent separation form, which is determined by parents’ emigration. Rather often even in the scientific studies the tendency is seen to link directly the family status with worse psychological adjustment of children. The object of the research in this article deals with the problems of psychological adjust-ment of children, and the goal of this study is to analyze the level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separation with parents, paying attention to the level of cumulative risk. The article analyzes the level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separation with parents, the level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separation with parents and national sample children in Lithuania, and the level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separation with parents and children with different level of cumulative risk. Conclusions of the research: 1. The level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separa-tion with parents does not differ. 2. The level of problems of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separa-tion with parents and national sample children in Lithuania does not differ. 3. The level of problems of psychological adjustment of children with high level of cumula-tive risk is higher than of those children with low level of cumulative risk.
Keywords :
children-parent separation, problems of psychological adjustment, cumulative risk
References :
Achenbach T. M., Rescorla L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-age Forms & Pro-files. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
Amato P. R. (2001 a). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, vol. 15 (3), p. 355–370.
Amato P. R. (2001 b). The “child of divorce” as a person prototype: Bias in the recall of in-formation about children in divorced families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 53, p. 59–69.
Appleyard K., Egelenad B., van Dulmen M. H. M., Sroufe L. A. (2005). When more is not better: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 46 (3), p. 235–245.
Cicchetti D. (2006). Development and Psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology: volume 1. Theory and Method (2nd ed., pp. 1–23). Hobo-ken, N. J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cicchetti D., Howes, P. W. (1991). Developmental psychopathology in the context of the family: Illustrations from the study of child maltreatment. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Sci-ence, vol. 23 (3), p. 257–281.
Cowan P. A., Cowan C. P. (2006). Developmental psychopathology from family systems and family risk factors perspectives: Implications for family research, practice, and policy. In D. Cicchetti and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology: volume 1. Theory and Method (2nd ed., pp. 530–587). Hoboken N. J.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dovydaitienė M. (2001). Tėvų skyrybas patyrusių vaikų pažeidžiamumas ir jo įveika. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.
DuBois D. L., Silverthorn N. (2004). Bias in self-perceptions and internalizing and external-izing problems in adjustment during early adolescence: A prospective investigation. Journal of Clinical and Adolescent Psychology, vol. 33 (2), p. 373–381.
Eldar-Avidan D., Haj-Yahia M. M., Greenbaum Ch. W. (2009). Divorce is a part of my life… Resilience, survival, and vulnerability: Young adults’ perception of the implications of paren-tal divorce. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 35 (1), p. 30–46.
Felner R. D., Brand S., DuBois D. L., Adan A. M., Mulhall P. F., Evans E. G. (1995). Socio-economic disadvantage, proximal environmental experiences, and socioemotional and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Investigation of a mediated effects model. Child Development, vol. 66, p. 774–792.
Garmezy N., Masten A. S., Tellegen A. (1984). The study of stress and competence in chil-dren: A building block for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, vol. 55, p. 97–111.
Greenberg M. T., Coie J. D., Lengua L. J., Pinderhughes E. E. (1999). Predicting develop-mental outcomes at school entry using a multiple-risk model: Four American communities. Devel-opmental Psychology, vol. 35 (2), p. 403–417.
Gutman L. M., Sameroff A. J., Cole R. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: Effect of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. Developmental Psychology, vol. 39 (4), p. 777–790.
Gutman L. M., Sameroff A. J., Eccles J. (2002). The academic achievement of African American students during early adolescence: An examination of multiple risk, promotive, and pro-tective factors. American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 30 (3), p. 367–399.
Hetherington E. M., Stanley-Hagan M. (1999). The adjustment of children with divorced parents: A risk and resiliency perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 40, No. 1, p. 129–140.
Jessor R., Turbin M. S., Costa F. M. (1998). Risk and protection in successful outcomes among disadvantaged adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, vol. 2 (4), p. 194–208.
Juffer F., Van Ijzendoorn M. H. (2007). Adoptees do not lack self-esteem: A meta-analysis of studies of self-esteem of transracial, international, and domestic adoptees. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 133 (6), p. 1067–1083.
Kajokienė I., Žukauskienė R. (2007). 6–18 m. vaikų reprezentacinės ir klinikinės imčių emocinių ir elgesio sunkumų sąsajų palyginimas su šeimos socialiniais, ekonominiais ir demografiniais veiksniais. Psichologija, Nr. 36, p. 22–43.
Kelly J. B., Emery R. E. (2003). Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives. Family Relations, vol. 52, p. 352–362.
Lazdauskas T. (2011). Vaikų psichologinis prisitaikymas ir jo kaita vaikų išsiskyrimo su tėvais kontekste. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.
Lengua L. J. (2006). Growth in temperament and parenting as predictors of adjustment dur-ing children’s transition to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, vol. 42 (5), p. 819–832.
Lima J., Caughy M., Nettles S. M., O’Campo P. J. (2010). Effects of cumulative risk on be-havioral and psychological well-being in frst grade: Moderation by neighborhood context. Social Science & Medicine, vol. 71, p. 1447–1454.
Luthar S. S, Sawyer J. A., Brown P. J. (2006). Conceptual issues in studies of resilience: Past, present, and future research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1094, p. 105–115.
Luthar S. S., Zigler E. (1991). Vulnerability and competence: A review of research on resili-ence in childhood. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, vol. 61, No. 1, p. 6–22.
Nowak Ch., Heinrichs N. (2008). A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Par-enting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, vol. 11, p. 114–144.
O’Connor T., G., Hetherington E. M., Reiss D. (1998). The Family systems and adolescent development: Shared and nonshared risk and protective factors in nondivorced and remarried families. Development and Psychopathology, vol. 10, p. 353–375.
Ou S. R., Reynolds A. J. (2008). Predictors of educational attainment in the Chicago Longi-tudinal study. School Psychology Quarterly, vol. 23 (2), p. 199–229.
Pedro-Carrol J. A. (2001). The promotion of wellness in children and families: Challenges and opportunities. American Psychologist, p. 993–1004.
Renken B., Egeland B., Marvinney D., Mangelsdorf S., Sroufe, L. A. (1989). Early childhood antecedents of aggression and passive-withdrawal in early elementary school. Journal of Per-sonality, vol. 57, p. 257–281.
Sameroff A. J., Seifer R., Baldwin A., Baldvin C. (1993). Stability of intelligence from pre-school to adolescence: The influence social and family risk factors. Child Development, vol. 64, p. 80–97.
Sameroff A. J., Seifer R., Barocas R., Zax M., Greenspan S. (1987). Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year old children: Social-Environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, vol. 79, p. 343–350.
Schultz D., Shaw D. S. (2003). Boys’ maladaptive social information processing, family emotional climate, and pathways to early conduct problems. Social Development, vol. 12 (3), p. 440–460.
Stanger C., Achenbach T. M., Verhulst F. C. (1994). Accelerating longitudinal research on child psychopathology: A practical example. Psychological Assessment, vol. 6 (2), p. 102–107.
Trentacosta C. J., Hyde L. W., Shaw D. S., Dishion R. J., Gardner F., Wilson M. (2008). The relations among cumulative risk, parenting, and behavior problems during early childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 49, No. 11, p. 1211–1219.
Tyson P., Tyson R. (1990). Psychoanalytic theories of development: An integration. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Van Ijzendoorn M. H., Juffer F., Klein Poelhuis C. W. (2005). Adoption and cognitive de-velopment: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted an nonadopted children’s IQ and school per-formance. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 131 (2), p. 301–316.
Wenar R., Kerig P. (2006). Developmental psychopathology: From infancy through adoles-cence (5th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Wright M. O’D., Masten A. S. (2006). Resilience processes in development. In S. Goldstein and R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 17–37). New York: Springer.
Zimmerman M. A., Arunkumar R. (1994). Resiliency research: Implications for school and policy. Social Policy Report, vol. 8, No. 4, p. 1–18.
Žukauskienė R., Kajokienė I. (2006). CBCL, TRF ir YSR metodikų standartizavimas naudojant 6–18 metų Lietuvos vaikų imties duomenis. Psichologija, Nr. 33, p. 31–45.
Cite as :
Lazdauskas, T. (2011). Išsiskyrimo su tėvais patirtį turinčių vaikų psichologinio prisitaikymo sunkumai rizikos sankaupos požiūriu [The difficulties of psychological adjustment of children who experienced separation with parents from the standpoint of cumulative risk]. Švietimas: politika, vadyba, kokybė / Education Policy, Management and Quality, 3(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.48127/spvk-epmq/11.3.19

