Volume/Issue :

Article type :

Original article

Page No :

27-46

Abstract :

This research addresses the issue of development of argumentation and understanding historical sources abilities in 4th year classes. The theoretical section has revealed that the foreign studies propose to change educational system moving from the direct memorization, the knowledge reproduction to the knowledge interpretation, reasoning and using historical sources not only to obtain the necessary information, but to use it as evidence to create historical understanding. This approach is influenced by constructivism ideas, which encourage students to be active in the learning process. The basic idea is that history learning encourages students to think critically and defend their views by advancing sound arguments. When students is involved in argumentation process, they not only express their minds, but also they use language to improve their intellect and reasoning skills. We called argumentation as giving reliable arguments from historical sources to support statement. The aim of the research is to identify how argumentative skills changes while working with historical sources through well-planned educational activity. The following research methods have been employed: the educational and psychological literature analysis, the education program analysis and the questionnaire of the tasks (taking into account primary education curriculum in Lithuania) whose data have been investigated using the qualitative analysis methods. Organization of educational activities and repeated research on abilities. The conclusions show that 4th formers are sufficiently successful in giving statements and arguments to support statement while working with historical sources. They are insufficiently able to give sound arguments, because it requires to understand source’s reliability. The additional educational activities have slightly contributed the improvement of the 4th formers’ argumentative skills. They used the primary and secondary sources to construct a statement supported by the arguments and some evidence. Students have noticed that the arguments found in the primary sources are far more convincing and sounder than in the secondary sources. After this activity students are sufficiently successful in making a statement and giving arguments and reliable evidence to support statement. The research data have revealed that using historical sources in argumentation tasks developed not only argumentation (language subject), but also understanding historical source as evidence (history subject) abilities.

Keywords :

primary education, teaching argumentation, teaching history, working with historical source

References :

Alarcon, J., Holmes, K., & Bybee, E. (2015). Historical thinking inside the box: Preservice elementary teachers use journey boxes to craft counter narratives. Social Studies, 106 (4), 186–192.
Australian curriculum (2015). Prieiga per internetą: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.
Barnet, S., & Bedau, H. A. (1999). Current issues and enduring questions: A guide to critical thinking and argument, with readings (5th ed. ed.). Boston, New York: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Cooper, H. (2011). What does it mean to think historically in the primary school. In L. Perikleous, & D. Shemilt (Eds.), The future of the past: Why history education matters (pp. 321–342) doi:http://www.ahdr.info/ckfinder/userfiles/files/TheFutureOfThePast.pdf.
Cooper, H. (2015). How can we plan for progression in primary school history? Revista De Estudios Sociales, (52), 16–31. doi:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/res52.2015.02.
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2015). The key practice, discuss and debate ideas: Conceptual framework, literature review, and provisional learning progressions for argumentation. ETS Research Report Series, 2015 (2), 1–21. doi:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ets2.12079.
Elder, D. I. (2012). Immense stimulation of mind: Critical thinking in the social studies. In M. Shaughnessy F. (Ed.), Critical thinking and higher order thinking: A current perspective (pp. 127–138). NY: Nova Science.
Hale, E. (2012). Conceptualizing a personal, intellectual history / narrative: The importance of strong sense metacognition to thinking critically. In M. Shaughnessy F. (Ed.), Critical thinking and higher order thinking: A current perspective (pp. 139–164). NY: Nova Science.
Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89 (3), 97–105.
Lee, P., & Shemilt, D. (2003). A scaffold, not a cage: Progression and progression models in history. Teaching History, (113), 13–23.
Lietuvos pradinio ugdymo bendroji programa, 2008. Prieiga per internetą: http://www.smm.lt/uploads/documents/svietimas/ugdymo-programos/1_pradinio%20ugdymo%20bendroji%20programa.pdf.
Mercer, N. (2009). Developing argumentation: Lessons learned in the primary school. In N. Muller Mirza, & A. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices. (pp. 177–194) Springer.
Muller Mirza, N., & Perret-Clermont, A. (2009). Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices. (pp. 1–5). Springer.
Nauckūnaitė, Z. (2007). Argumentavimas: Samprata ir didaktinės perspektyvos (1) [Argumentation: Conception and didactic perspectives]. Pedagogy Studies/Pedagogika, (86), 135–141. doi:http://www.biblioteka.vpu.lt/pedagogika/PDF/2007/86/135-141.pdf.
Nauckūnaitė, Z. (2005). Argumentavimo mokymas [Teaching argumentation]. Gimtasis Žodis, 1, 1–5.
Newman, M. (2014). Vital witnesses: Using primary sources in history and social studies. (pp. xiii). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Rimkutė, E. (2007). Mąstymas ir kalba [Thinking and speech]. (pp. 126–127). Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2012). Assessment of thinking skills. In M. Shaughnessy F. (Ed.), Critical thinking and higher order thinking: A current perspective (pp. 191–204). NY: Nova Science.
Steiner, D. M. (2014). Learning, constructivist theories of. Value Inquiry Book Series, 276, 319–320.
Stolare, M. (2017). Did the vikings really have helmets with horns? Sources and narrative content in Swedish upper primary school history teaching. Education 3-13, 45 (1), 36–50.
Šetkus, B. (2002). Darbas su istorijos šaltiniais: Praktiniai patarimai [Work with historical sources: Practical advices]. (pp. 10–11, 22–25). Vilnius: Vaga.
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20 (2), 87–110. doi:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1.
The Ontario curriculum, 2013. Prieiga per internetą: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/sshg18curr2013.pdf.
Žemgulienė, A. (2014). Šiuolaikinės didaktikos kaita: Istorijos mokymo pradiniame ugdyme didaktinės tendencijos [Changes in modern didactics: Didactic trends in teaching history in primary classes]. In R. Bruzgelevičienė (Ed.), Ugdymo paradigmų iššūkiai didaktikai: Kolektyvinė monografija (pp. 122–156). Vilnius: Lietuvos edukologijos universiteto leidykla.
Žemgulienė, A., & Balcevič, N. (2016). Istorinio raštingumo ugdymas pradinėse klasėse: III–IV klasės mokinių istorinio šaltinio supratimo gebėjimai [Development of historical literacy: 3rd–4th formers’ abilities to understand a historical source]. Pedagogy Studies/Pedagogika, 123 (3).
Wineburg, S. (2010). Thinking like a historian. Teaching with Primary Sources Quarterly, 3 (1), 2–5. doi:http://www.loc.gov/teachers/tps/quarterly/historical_thinking/article.html.
Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational psychology (11th ed., Global ed.). Upper Saddle River (N. J.): Pearson Education.

Cite as :

Žemgulienė, A., & Babachinaitė, A. (2018). Argumentavimas pradinėse klasėse dirbant su istoriniais šaltiniais: 4 klasės mokinių argumentavimo ir šaltinio supratimo gebėjimų kaita [Argumentation in primary class while working with historical sources: The development of 4th formers’ argumentation and understanding historical source abilities]. Švietimas: politika, vadyba, kokybė / Education Policy, Management and Quality, 10(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.48127/spvk-epmq/18.10.27