DEVELOPING BOTANICAL LITERACY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL: PLANT IDENTIFICATION AND PRECONDITIONS FOR REFLECTION
DOI: 10.48127/gu/26.32.65
| Author's Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Institutional affilation - Country | Author's Email | Author's ORCID |
|
Vilniaus universitetas, Lietuva |
petkeviciene.r@gmail.com |
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1653-8094 |
|
Volume/Issue :
Article type :
Case studies
Page No :
65-77
Abstract :
It has been nearly thirty years since Elisabeth Schussler and James Wandersee, two American botanists and biology educators, introduced the concept of “plant blindness” (1998). They used this term to describe the “inability to see or notice plants in one’s environment.” In recent years, this important topic has regained attention. This work aims to highlight plants as the most important group of organisms for the existence of ecosystems, to analyze the level of attention they receive in the Lithuanian primary school science curriculum, and to encourage teachers to reflect on whether sufficient emphasis is placed on plants in science lessons. The work presents the results of tasks completed by teams of third-grade students from 14 primary schools (each team consisted of two students), based on an analysis of their worksheets. In a plant recognition task, students were asked to name ten plants shown in slides. All teams correctly identified linden, spruce, pine, and sunflower, while only two teams correctly named celery. Students were then asked to indicate which of these plants are herbaceous and which are coniferous. Five pairs of students correctly identified all herbaceous plants: celery, marigold, dandelion, bulrush, and sunflower. The same number of teams failed to classify juniper as a conifer. Another task revealed that students can independently learn new botanical concepts, comprehend written texts, and complete related tasks. However, about one-third of the teams made mistakes in at least one of the six reading comprehension questions. This suggests student distraction, lack of attentiveness, and insufficient engagement with the text.
Keywords :
plant identification, primary school students, science curriculum, scientific literacy, worksheets
References :
Amprazis, A., & Papadopoulou, P. (2025). Plant knowledge in an era of limited plant awareness: A consideration for meaningful change. Research in Science Education, 43(4), Article 10294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10294-6
Amprazis, A., & Papadopoulou, P. (2024). Key competencies in education for sustainable development: A valuable framework for enhancing plant awareness. Plants, People, Planet, 7(4), 1195–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10625
Braud, M. (2001). Primary plants: A handbook for teaching plant science in the primary school. Questions Publishing.
Brkovic, I., Sanders, D., & Nyberg, E. (2025). Investigating plant awareness: Methodologies, challenges, and possibilities. Plants, People, Planet, 7(4), 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10604
Frisch, J. K., Unwin, M. M., & Saunders, G. W. (2010). Name that plant! Overcoming plant blindness and developing a sense of place using science and environmental education. In A. Bodzin, B. Shiner Klein, & S. Weaver (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 143–157). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9222-9_10
Nacionalinė švietimo agentūra. (2022). Gamtos mokslų bendroji programa [Natural science education general curriculum]. https://emokykla.lt/bendrosios-programos/visos-bendrosios-programos/38
Kalali, F. (2019). Quel enseignement des plantes au 21e siècle? Quelques perspectives didactiques [What plant education in the 21st century? Some didactic perspectives]. Bildungsforschung, 1, 1–21. https://bildungsforschung.org/ojs/index.php/bildungsforschung/article/view/278/308
Lamanauskas, V. (2009). The importance of strengthening of natural science education in a primary school. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 11, 5–8. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/node/202
Lamanauskas, V. (2011). Some aspects of natural science literacy and competence of primary school teachers. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 36, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/11.36.05
Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01256
Passeti, A., & Brun, É. (2022). L'utilisation des conceptions sur les végétaux des élèves au cycle 2 pour construire un enseignement curriculaire en lien avec les enjeux modernes [The use of students' conceptions about plants in cycle 2 to build a curricular education in line with modern issues] (Master's thesis). DUMAS. https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-03821001v1
Ro, C. (2019, April 29). Why 'plant blindness' matters — and what you can do about it. BBC Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190425-plant-blindness-what-we-lose-with-nature-deficit-disorder
Strgar, J., Torkar, G., & Strgulc Krajšek, S. (2025). The purpose of the school garden is more than just growing plants. Journal of Biological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2025.2489512
Wulandari, S., Sunandar, A., & Setiadi, A. E. (2023). The plant blindness profile of secondary school students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i3.65315
Cite as :
Makarskaitė-Petkevičienė, R. (2026). Botaninio raštingumo ugdymas pradinėje mokykloje: augalų (at)pažinimas ir refleksijos prielaidos [Developing botanical literacy in primary school: Plant identification and preconditions for reflection]. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas bendrojo ugdymo mokykloje / Natural Science Education in a Comprehensive School, 32, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.48127/gu/26.32.65
