| Author's Information | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Institutional affilation - Country | Author's Email | Author's ORCID |
|
Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic |
danuse.nezvalova@upol.cz |
n/a |
|
Volume/Issue :
Article type :
Original articles
Page No :
60-69
Abstract :
Inquiry and nature of science have become an almost ubiquitous themes in science education around the world. Abd-El-Khalick, et al (2004) noted that inquiry in sci-ence education is one of the few overarching themes that cut across pre-college sci-ence curricula in countries around the globe. The prominence of inquiry in science education highlights the need to understand what is inquiry and what are the chal-lenges of implementation. The teacher should attempt to promote student understanding of traditional sub-ject matter using an inquiry-oriented teaching approach. Such approach provides stu-dents with experience in “doing” science, an experiential base upon which to reflect about the process and nature of science. NOS and scientific inquiry can serve as uni-fying themes that provide a meaningful context for the learning of the more tradition-al science concepts and principles. NOS and scientific inquiry are instructional objec-tives of primary importance that permeate all aspects of curriculum and instruction.
Keywords :
instructional approach, scientific literacy, scientific knowledge
References :
Ab-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), p. 665–701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N.G., Mamlock-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H, (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspective. Science Education, 88: 397–419.
Aikenhead, G. (1973). The measurement of high school students’ knowledge about science and scientists. Science Education, 57(4), p. 349–359.
Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers´ un-derstanding of nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72(1), p. 73–82.
American Association for the Advancement of Science AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for Sci-ence Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bady, R. A. (1979). Students’ understanding of hypothesis testing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16 (1), p. 61–65.
Bell, R. Blair, R., Lederman, N. G. & Crafword, B. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship on high school students’ understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), p. 487–509.
Broadhust, N. A. (1970). A study of selected learning outcomes of graduating high school students in South Australian Schools. Science Education, 54(1), p. 17–21.
Durkee, P. (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special references to high-ability students studying physics. Science Education, 58(3), p. 343–356.
Haukoos, G. D., & Penik, J.E. (1985). The effects of classroom climate on college science students: A replication study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), p. 163–168.
Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W.W. (1963). A history of science cases for high schools in the de-velopment of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1(1), p. 33–47.
Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(5), p. 743–760.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), p. 331–359.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), p. 916–929.
Lederman, N. G. (2006). Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In: Flick, L. B. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds). Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 301–317.
Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), p. 225–239.
Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), p. 57–66.
National Science Education Standards. (2003). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Research Council NRC (2004). Inquiry and the National Science Education Stand-ards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Ogunniyi, M. B. (1983). Relative effects of a history/philosophy of science course on student teachers’ performance on two models of science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1(2), p. 193–199.
Olstad, R. G. (1969). The effect of science teaching methods on the understanding of sci-ence. Science Education, 53(1), p. 9–11.
Riley, J.P. (1979). The influence of hands/on science process training on preservise teachers’ acquisition of process skills and attitude toward science and science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16(5), p. 373/384.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). A humanistic intent: The program of preservice elementary education at the University of Florida. Science Education, 58, 369-376.
Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scot, L. & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of sci-ence through history: Action research in classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), p. 409–421.
Spears, J., & Zollman, D. (1977). The influence of structured versus unstructured laboratory on students’ understanding of process of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(1), p. 33–38.
Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Antropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57–68.
Trent, J. (1965). The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3(3), p. 224–229.
Welch, W.W., & Walberg, H.J. (1972). A national experiment in curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 9 (3), p. 373–383.
Cite as :
Nezvalova, D. (2011). Coherence of nature of science and inquiry in science instruction. Kn. Gamtamokslinis ugdymas bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje - 2011 [In. Natural Science Education at a General School - 2011] (XVII nacionalinės mokslinės-praktinės konferencijos straipsnių rinkinys, Vilnius, 2011 m. balandžio mėn. 29-30d. / Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Scientific-Practical Conference, Vilnius, 29-30 April, 2011) (pp. 60-69). MMC "Scientia Educologica".
